|||

An evaluation puzzle: Loaves and fishes

Oxfam fixes the road after the flood, and Save the Children fixes the school.

The school couldn’t have been fixed without the road.

Both of the charities report to the UNs standardised reporting format, and both record their contribution as one school fixed”. Both argue: if our organisation hadn’t stepped in, the school wouldn’t have been built (counterfactual) but we did step in, and it was. Ergo, our organisation caused the fixing of the school.

So when the UN aggregates the reports, will it find that a total of two schools were repaired?

You are asked to comment on the reports.

Up next An evaluation puzzle: “Freak weather” Two NGOs prepare ships to help people stranded after a tsunami on a remote island. NGO A is well-prepared and sets sail in time. NGO B has barely An evaluation puzzle: “Many hands” In its report, CARE say they saved the villagers from being swept away in the flood. A critic argues, even if CARE hadn’t intervened
Latest posts Shutdown of the original Theorymaker About me Version 2 of Causal Map Guide Causal Mapping - an earlier guide An evaluation puzzle: “Talent show” An evaluation puzzle: “Mobile first” An evaluation puzzle: “Many hands” An evaluation puzzle: Loaves and fishes An evaluation puzzle: “Freak weather” An evaluation puzzle: “Billionaire” A starter kit for reproducible research with R How do you explain reproducible research to clients? Moved to Clevedon, UK! Beaufort and Rubrics Inventory & analysis of small conservation grants, C&W Africa - Powell & Mesbach! Lots of charts! Students in predominantly ethnic minority classes want segregated education very much. The others don’t. Title: Tenses in Colour